The annual failure rate figure is calculated based on a certain drive failing with the service life factored in to it. It’s better than a typical consumer’s sample size of one, but clearly the 22,731 Hitachi hard drives and the 36,863 Seagate drives lend more credibility to the survey.īackBlaze’s hard drive report shows lowest number of drive failures in a quarter ever for the cloud storage companyīackBlaze’s numbers aren’t quite straightforward, though. For the most recent hard drive reliability statistics, as well as the raw hard drive test data, visit Hard Drive Data and Stats.
BackBlaze has just 238 Toshiba hard drives in service, with Western Digital drives pushing the sample to 1,691. to a cloud object storage, further enhancing availability and reliability. Hard drives from Toshiba and Western Digital are also represented, but one weakness of the data is the much smaller sample size. With Backblaze B2, QNAP NAS users can now enjoy a cloud storage service that. The Vault architecture calculates at 99.999999999 (11 x 9s) annual durability. In order for the company to think a rating is reliable it needs a. The consumer drive has a one-year warranty, whereas the enterprise drive has a five-year warranty. B2 Resiliency, Durability and Availability Christopher Ma02:08 Backblaze's B2 Cloud Storage takes advantage of the Backblaze Vaults architecture to create a highly resilient, durable, and available storage service. Since there were only 18 of them deployed, Backblazes confidence rating on their reliability is a too-high 6.7 percent. That’s good, but the overall winner is still Hitachi, which has tracked at just about 1 percent for the last three surveys. Backblaze does note in its report the difference in the respective warranty periods of these drives. This time around, though, Seagate dropped its failure rate to 3.48 percent on a total 36,863 drives.
0 kommentar(er)
